By 
That is quite different from the traditional definition of project. Typically, if you hear the word “project” used at all in the work environment, it is to mean an initiative, a temporary solution to a specific problem, or a specific task. This definition may be fine for your individual use, or perhaps you use it in your personal life. If you do, please consider separating the kind of work that projects involve and the kind of work that people manage. Many project management training programs offer hybrid applications, including programs that offer customized (for you) solutions to your specific problems.
Larger businesses, on the other hand, typically have a different approach to project management. Many organizations simply take the basic project management concepts of: planning, organizing, leading and controlling, and monitoring, and supervising activities, and organize these phases into three main phases: Scope, Planning, Definition and Delivery Planning. In this way, the traditional concept of project is fine-tuned to a specific, specialized approach to the development of specific projects as mentioned on PRINCE2 practitioner belfast.
Everyone refers to a business venture, a mission critical project, or a specific task as a project. These are not, however, the same. The word project is just another way to refer to the various functions that must be completed in order to deliver a specific end-result. These are different from other classifications of work. A mission critical project that could have a significant impact on the end-user and the organization, or a new product or service to meet market needs, for example, may be a project as well.
Typically, no one will argue that an organization’s project management productivity will improve through better organization, better communication, and better planning. Many people will argue that they have less time to manage projects because of the increased level of information and other responsibilities. The truth is that even with the real obstacles inherent in all these areas, projects can be executed with better time management skills and more efficient utilization of resources.
What projects make the most sense for organizations and direct answers to the question “How can we improve our project management?” will provide the greatest improvement in productivity and efficiency. The two most important components are direction and management. Specific goals are needed to set the direction. Often people are asked to define larger goals to define the direction more clearly. The sizes and issues to be addressed are identified and priorities defined to minimize resources.
Use of budgeting, scheduling, vendor selection and needs estimating are tools created to more effectively manage. Once project direction is established, management methods similar to the group characteristic process to ensure that all individuals are on the same page. Identifying and utilizing the right tools and utilizing the resources are also critical to a clear direction with opportunities for effective results.
Consider the following two scenarios and the differences:
Scenario A: Product A is available and needs to be delivered on time and within budget. The product development team meets on a regular basis to discuss all the issues involved in this effort and what modifications might be made during the project. The team reviews the process before actually doing the work. This gets everyone in the process to communicate with the team as the process should be a common method in all phases.
The team has identified all the critical factors in the schedule
The team establishes a planning schedule and a work allocation schedule
The team determines an inventory schedule in order to prepare the materials to be delayed.
The team sets a goal to finish early
The team determines the use of certain tools on the schedule
All the resources are of required, known in advance
The team determines the use of all tools as the process may significantly change over the life of the effort
The management of the work to be done at each phase is set
The management of the project is more visible
The team hears that members of the team are on a team working to improve the tools and processes of the company. Everyone at other levels of the relationship with the product or teams is aware of team development. This is also telling the team members they are not merely assigned to a specific project and then left alone.
The team members are notified through various methods, but then met with schedule rules as the project timeline developed from management.
The management team becomes familiar with the team’s progress
Last Words
When team member feedback is gathered, the team determines that realized scheduling is less than the original estimate of how long the timing will be. Management takes steps to address the new estimates and the team makes improvements to other activities based on their previously determined schedule targets. Management supports the improvements, even giving flexible time frames. Team members feel empowered and encouraged to take core input to the process, and then when needed, they help to improve schedules and other resources.
In each case both points of production are fixed for delivery and with excellent timing management exists for the entire project. Each project must follow a process for the best results by all the team members.
Comments